Filters
Question type

Study Flashcards

Because their contracts are _____________, minors have the right, until a reasonable time after reaching the age of majority, to __________, or avoid, their contracts.


A) Void; disaffirm
B) Void; affirm
C) Void; resist
D) Voidable; disaffirm
E) Voidable; affirm

F) A) and B)
G) B) and D)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Which of the following is a term for laws that limit the types of business activities in which parties may legally engage on Sundays?


A) Sabbath laws only
B) Blue laws only
C) True laws only
D) Sabbath and blue laws, but not true laws
E) Sabbath laws, blue laws, and true laws

F) D) and E)
G) None of the above

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

A person who has legal _____________ to contract is one who has the mental ability to understand his or her rights and obligations under a contract and, therefore, will presumably be able to understand how to comply with the terms of the agreement.


A) Capacity
B) Understanding
C) Ratification
D) History
E) Consideration

F) A) and B)
G) B) and C)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Historically, which of the following were considered people with limited or no capacity?


A) Minors
B) Insane persons
C) Women
D) Minors and insane persons, but not women
E) Minors, insane persons, and women

F) C) and E)
G) A) and C)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Reference - Cheap Motorcycle. Tony, a hateful, disgruntled, business law teacher notices that a student, Peter, who is past the age of majority, has bought a new motorcycle. Peter has struggled through school, is in his last semester, and needs to pass business law in order to graduate. Tony tells Peter that he would like to see Peter pass; and, in the next sentence, Tony says that he wants to buy the motorcycle for $100, a price far below the value of the motorcycle. Peter asks if Tony is serious about the price, and Tony replies, "I have the power here!" Tony proceeds to draw up a contract for the sale of the motorcycle for $100 with lots of fine print by which he can sue Peter and recover any maintenance costs for the next five years. Seeing that he is at an advantage, Tony also throws into the deal that Peter will mow Tony's one acre yard for $5 all summer long. After Tony tells Peter to either take the contract or leave it, Tony reluctantly signs. Which of the following is true if Peter seeks to rescind the contractual agreement to sell the motorcycle?


A) Peter may rescind the agreement on grounds of fraud.
B) Peter may rescind the agreement on grounds of unconscionability.
C) Peter may rescind the agreement on grounds of mistake.
D) Peter may rescind the agreement on grounds of fraud, unconscionability, and mistake.
E) Peter may rescind the agreement on grounds of fraud or unconscionability, but not mistake.

F) B) and C)
G) C) and D)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Bob is hired to do computer sales for an electronics store. He agrees that if he leaves his employment, he will not work for another computer store within 25 miles for a period of two years. That type of agreement is called a[n] _____________.


A) Covenant not to compete
B) Employment covenant
C) Working covenant
D) Termination agreement
E) Public policy agreement

F) None of the above
G) B) and C)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

John and Joan enter a contract whereby John will feed Joan's cat for $100 while Joan is on vacation. Another part of the contract provides that John will mow Joan's whole yard for the summer for $500. Just before Joan leaves for vacation, John discovers that Joan's cat is not a domesticated cat, but a lion rescued from the circus. John tells Joan to forget it, that she misrepresented the nature of the animal, and that she can forget about the contract, including the lawn mowing deal. Joan, being a somewhat reasonable person, feels bad about not telling John the whole truth about the cat; and she is willing to give in on that issue. She does, however, want to enforce the yard mowing agreement. What is her best argument?

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

That the contract contains two parts tha...

View Answer

If a person's mental deficiencies have resulted in his being adjudicated insane and a guardian has been appointed for him, he has no capacity to enter into contracts, and any contract he attempts to enter into is void.

A) True
B) False

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

What was the result in Swalberg v. Hannegan, the case in the text in which the minor attempted to disaffirm a contract for the purchase of an automobile?


A) The minor was legally required to restore the other contracting party to his pre-contract position.
B) The minor was not allowed to disaffirm the contract because a vehicle was involved.
C) The minor was not allowed to disaffirm the contract because a contract in an amount over $10,000 was involved.
D) The minor was not allowed to disaffirm the contract because a contract in an amount over $5,000 was involved.
E) The minor was allowed to disaffirm the contract and was not required to restore the other contracting party to his pre-contract position.

F) A) and E)
G) B) and C)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Reference - Irresponsible Teen. At age 17, in a state in which the age of majority is 18, Sally purchased a prom dress from Formal Stuff. She wore it to the prom and then attempted to return it to the store claiming that she was a minor and that she was entitled to a refund. The dress had clearly been worn and had a purple stain which Sally claimed was from grape juice. Additionally, a few days before she turned 18, Sally purchased a used car from Dings and Dents used cars. She had a deal whereby she paid $100 per month on the car. She drove the car and made payments for fourteen months after she turned 18. Then, she returned the car to Dings and Dents and told them that she wanted all her money back. Dings and Dents claimed the car was a necessity. Sally and her parents claimed that the parents were ready and willing to provide a car to Sally and that she only purchased the car from Dings and Dents because she liked that particular style and color. When purchases of the dress and car were made, the sellers knew that Sally was under the age of 18. In the dispute between Sally and the owner of Dings and Dents, which of the following is true regarding any claim that Sally affirmed the contract?


A) So long as, after reaching the age of majority, Sally did not state orally or in writing that she intended to be bound by the contract, then she did not commit the type of express ratification required for her to be bound.
B) Sally may have impliedly ratified the contract by making payments for so long after she turned 18.
C) An implied ratification occurs when parents agree to accept the debt entered into by a minor.
D) If Sally caused any damage whatsoever to the car, she was said to have impliedly ratified the contract.
E) Sally was required to expressly ratify the contract before she could be bound to it so long as no damage was done; but if she did any damage to the car, as a matter of law, she is said to have expressly ratified it.

F) D) and E)
G) B) and D)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Which of the following is true regarding an agreement to commit a crime or a tort?


A) An agreement to commit a crime is enforceable, but an agreement to commit a tort is unenforceable.
B) An agreement to commit a tort is enforceable, but an agreement to commit a crime is unenforceable.
C) An agreement to commit a crime is unenforceable, and an agreement to commit a tort is unenforceable unless a business tort in involved in which case the agreement is enforceable.
D) An agreement to commit a crime is unenforceable except an agreement to commit white collar crime in which case the agreement is enforceable; and an agreement to commit a tort is unenforceable unless a business tort is involved in which case the agreement is enforceable.
E) An agreement to commit a crime is unenforceable, and an agreement to commit a tort is also unenforceable.

F) D) and E)
G) B) and D)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

A statement releasing one of the parties to an agreement from all liability, regardless of who is at fault or what the injury suffered is, would be referred to as a[n] _____________.


A) Substantive agreement
B) Adhesion agreement
C) In pari delicto agreement.
D) Exculpatory
E) Res Ipsa

F) B) and E)
G) B) and C)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Which of the following is the majority rule regarding a minor's misrepresentation of his or her age?


A) That if a competent party relies on a misrepresentation in good faith, the minor gives up the right to disaffirm the agreement.
B) That the minor must restore the competent party to that party's precontract position before obtaining the disaffirmance.
C) That the minor may disaffirm but that the competent party has the right to sue the minor in tort and recover damages for fraud.
D) That misrepresentation does not affect the minor's right to disaffirm the contract.
E) That misrepresentation results in the minor receiving a return of only half the consideration he or she supplied.

F) A) and E)
G) A) and B)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Reference - Irresponsible Teen. At age 17, in a state in which the age of majority is 18, Sally purchased a prom dress from Formal Stuff. She wore it to the prom and then attempted to return it to the store claiming that she was a minor and that she was entitled to a refund. The dress had clearly been worn and had a purple stain which Sally claimed was from grape juice. Additionally, a few days before she turned 18, Sally purchased a used car from Dings and Dents used cars. She had a deal whereby she paid $100 per month on the car. She drove the car and made payments for fourteen months after she turned 18. Then, she returned the car to Dings and Dents and told them that she wanted all her money back. Dings and Dents claimed the car was a necessity. Sally and her parents claimed that the parents were ready and willing to provide a car to Sally and that she only purchased the car from Dings and Dents because she liked that particular style and color. When purchases of the dress and car were made, the sellers knew that Sally was under the age of 18. Which of the following is true regarding Sally's attempt to return the damaged dress?


A) In all states Sally has the right to keep the dress and get a refund.
B) In all states Sally must return the dress; but she has a right to a full refund.
C) Regardless of what she does with the dress, Sally has no right to a refund in any state.
D) In some states Sally would have an obligation of restitution to the store.
E) In all states Sally would have an obligation of restitution to the store.

F) B) and D)
G) All of the above

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

As a general rule, most states will not allow a minor to disaffirm contracts for which of the following?


A) Life insurance
B) Health insurance
C) Psychological counseling
D) Life insurance, health insurance, and psychological counseling
E) Life insurance and health insurance, but not psychological counseling

F) C) and D)
G) D) and E)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Reference - Useless Friend. Charles, who is very gullible, is friends with Bobby. Bobby, who cannot be trusted, decides to try to bind Charles to a contract in Bobby's favor. Bobby has Charles sign a contract promising to wash Bobby's car once a week for a month for $80. The contract incorporated by reference terms on the back. The terms on the back were in very small print and required Charles for one year to cook dinner for Bobby, do his laundry, and clean his apartment. Bobby is also very angry with his former girlfriend, Tessa, and decides to start rumors, that would constitute the tort of defamation, such as that she has a vile disease, cheated on tests, and stole from friends. Bobby wants to enlist the help of Charles but knows that Charles would be hesitant to assist in his endeavors. One evening, however, Charles drank too much beer and was clearly intoxicated - a fact apparent to Bobby. Bobby had him sign a contract agreeing to defame Tessa for $50. When he sobers up, Charles tells Bobby that he was drunk and that he has no intention of defaming Tessa, who also happens to be Charles' new girlfriend. He also finally takes a look at the contract involving work for Bobby and tells Bobby that the contract is outrageous and that he has no intentions of going through with any of it. Which of the following is true under the Restatement of Contracts, Section 16, regarding the claim of Charles that he should be able to avoid the contract involving Tessa because he was intoxicated?


A) Contracts of an intoxicated person are voidable by the intoxicant if the other party had reason to know that because of the intoxicated person's condition, that person was unable to understand the nature and consequences of the transaction or was unable to act in a reasonable manner in relation to the transaction.
B) Contracts of an intoxicated person are void if the other party had reason to know that because of the intoxicated person's condition, that person was unable to understand the nature and consequences of the transaction or was unable to act in a reasonable manner in relation to the transaction.
C) Contracts of an intoxicated person are enforceable because a person should be bound by his or her actions.
D) Contracts of an intoxicated person are void only if it can be proven that the other party was involved in encouraging the abuse of alcohol by the intoxicated person.
E) Contracts of an intoxicated person are voidable by the intoxicant only if it can be proven that the other party was involved in encouraging the abuse of alcohol by the intoxicated person.

F) D) and E)
G) A) and D)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Which of the following is some sort of mental or physical defect that prevents a person from being able to enter into a legally binding contract?


A) Immajority
B) Capacity
C) Chronic illness
D) Incapacity
E) None of these

F) A) and B)
G) A) and C)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Set forth in detail the test that most states follow regarding the treatment of the capacity of intoxicated persons to enter into contracts.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Most states follow the Restatement of Co...

View Answer

Reference - Beauty Shop Woes. When Janice went to work as a hair stylist in Rick's beauty shop, she entered into an agreement with Rick, whereby, if she left she would not work for another beauty shop within 50 miles for 2 years. Rick trained Janice in a number of new techniques. After nine months, Janice was offered a great job down the street at a new beauty shop, quit Rick, and had a number of customers follow her down the street to her new job. Rick claimed that she had signed a contract and had no right to go to work at the new shop. Janice disagreed and told Rick that no judge in the country would enforce such an agreement. Janice told Rick that she was more worried about a customer, Treena, who was threatening to sue her because her hair turned green after Janice worked on it. Janice agreed that Treena's hair was damaged. Janice pointed out, however, that she told Treena that odd results could result from a dye attempt, and she required that Treena sign a contract releasing Janice from all liabilities before she did anything with Treena's hair. Treena, however, sued anyway. The agreement Rick and Janice entered into is referred to as which of the following?


A) A competition agreement
B) A prohibited competition agreement
C) A covenant not to misappropriate
D) A policy agreement
E) A covenant not to compete

F) A) and D)
G) A) and E)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Reference - Useless Friend. Charles, who is very gullible, is friends with Bobby. Bobby, who cannot be trusted, decides to try to bind Charles to a contract in Bobby's favor. Bobby has Charles sign a contract promising to wash Bobby's car once a week for a month for $80. The contract incorporated by reference terms on the back. The terms on the back were in very small print and required Charles for one year to cook dinner for Bobby, do his laundry, and clean his apartment. Bobby is also very angry with his former girlfriend, Tessa, and decides to start rumors, that would constitute the tort of defamation, such as that she has a vile disease, cheated on tests, and stole from friends. Bobby wants to enlist the help of Charles but knows that Charles would be hesitant to assist in his endeavors. One evening, however, Charles drank too much beer and was clearly intoxicated - a fact apparent to Bobby. Bobby had him sign a contract agreeing to defame Tessa for $50. When he sobers up, Charles tells Bobby that he was drunk and that he has no intention of defaming Tessa, who also happens to be Charles' new girlfriend. He also finally takes a look at the contract involving work for Bobby and tells Bobby that the contract is outrageous and that he has no intentions of going through with any of it. Which of the following would be a possible defense to the contract as far as the harsh and lopsided requirements involving chores is concerned?


A) Substantive unconscionability
B) Unclear drafting
C) Procedural unconscionability
D) Outrageous wording
E) Adhesion conscionability

F) B) and E)
G) A) and B)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Showing 41 - 60 of 69

Related Exams

Show Answer